4.7 Article

Capturing size effects in effective field methods through the prism of strain gradient elasticity

期刊

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS
卷 186, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2023.104782

关键词

Heterogeneous materials; Size effects; Property contribution tensors; Strain gradient elasticity; Effective field methods

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The majority of studies in the open literature use homogenization models to consider microstructural parameters, but they fail to account for size effects at small scales. This study introduces a novel approach that combines property contribution tensors with strain gradient elasticity to capture size effects and improve predictions about effective elastic properties.
The majority of studies in the open literature use homogenization models that consider microstructural parameters such as shape, orientation, distribution, and volume fraction of inhomogeneities. However, size effects, that become important when small scales are considered, are not taken into account. This study presents a novel approach by combining property contribution tensors with strain gradient elasticity to offer a formulation of effective field methods (EFM) that captures size effects in a single step and improves the accuracy of predictions about effective elastic properties. Three commonly used EFM are considered, i.e., the Non-Interaction, the Mori-Tanaka, and the Maxwell. The effectiveness of the novel approach is validated through comparison with previous formulations in the open literature that do not consider property contribution tensors. The novel approach is further tested by applying it to a simple case of a material containing pores of different sizes and comparing the results with two-step homogenization approaches and finite element models from the open literature. The comparison demonstrates the ability of the novel formulation to capture size effects and to closely follow the predictions of the FE models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据