4.7 Article

A theoretical analysis of refractive index sensor with improved sensitivity using titanium dioxide, graphene, and antimonene grating: Pseudomonas bacteria detection

期刊

MEASUREMENT
卷 216, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.112957

关键词

Biosensor; Titanium dioxide; Graphene; Affinity layer; Surface plasmon resonance; Grating Pseudomonas bacteria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A surface plasmon resonance (SPR) based biosensor has been proposed for detecting Pseudomonas bacteria. The sensor design includes two silvers (Ag), a Titanium dioxide (TiO2), graphene, and an affinity layer with antimonene grating placed over a BK7 coupling prism based on the Kretschmann configuration. The sensor's performance parameters have been evaluated numerically and analyzed, showing improved efficacy in detecting Pseudomonas bacteria with the inclusion of TiO2 and affinity layers. A comparative analysis between the proposed and existing structures has been made, achieving sensitivity, quality factor, and detection accuracy parameters of 370.8 degrees (RIU)-1, 137.843(1/RIU), and 0.371747 degree -1.
A surface plasmon resonance (SPR) based biosensor is proposed to detect Pseudomonas bacteria. The sensor design consists of two silvers (Ag), a Titanium dioxide (TiO2), graphene, and an affinity layer with antimonene grating placed over a BK7 coupling prism based on the Kretschmann configuration. The principle of attenuated total reflection (ATR) is used to investigate the performance of our proposed SPR based biosensor. The sensor's performance parameters, such as sensitivity, detection accuracy, and quality factor, have been evaluated numerically and then analyzed. Inclusion of the TiO2 and affinity layers improves the suggested structure's ef-ficacy in detecting Pseudomonas bacteria. A comparative analysis is made between the proposed and the existing structures. The sensitivity, quality factor, and detection accuracy parameters 370.8 degrees (RIU)-1, 137.843(1/RIU), and 0.371747 degree -1 are achieved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据