4.7 Article

Enhanced transverse nuclear magnetization of an atomic co-magnetometer at the optimal oscillating magnetic field

期刊

MEASUREMENT
卷 217, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113013

关键词

Atomic magnetometer; Nuclear magnetization; Sensitivity; Nuclear magnetic resonance; Optimization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We demonstrate an optimization method of the oscillating magnetic field to enhance the transverse nuclear magnetization in atomic co-magnetometers operated in the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) regime. The relationship between the transverse nuclear magnetization and the relaxation time is revealed. This optimization method allows for quick and accurate selection of the optimal operating point for each atomic co-magnetometer and effectively reduces the bias instability.
The nuclear magnetization produced by hyperpolarized noble-gas molecules of co-magnetometers presents excellent potential in ultrahigh accuracy measurement. Here we demonstrate an optimization method of the oscillating magnetic field to enhance the transverse nuclear magnetization for atomic co-magnetometers operated in the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) regime. Under normal operating conditions, the absolute magnetic field produced by transverse nuclear magnetization is studied based on the nuclear spin dynamics and measured by the in-situ magnetometer experimentally. The different oscillating magnetic fields are applied to obtain the maximum transverse nuclear magnetization in various operating temperatures. Combined with the measurements, we reveal the relationship between the transverse nuclear magnetization and the relaxation time, which is consistent with our method. The optimization method makes selecting the optimal operating point for each atomic co-magnetometer quick and accurate to enhance transverse nuclear magnetization. In addition, operating at the optimal oscillating magnetic field can effectively reduce the bias instability of the atomic co-magnetometer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据