4.7 Article

A deep learning reconstruction framework for low dose phase contrast via inter-contrast enhancement

期刊

MEASUREMENT
卷 219, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113247

关键词

Phase contrast computed tomography; Low dose; Multi-contrast; Convolutional neural network; Inter-contrast enhancement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phase contrast computed tomography (PCCT) provides excellent imaging contrast on soft tissue by generating absorption, phase and dark-field contrast tomographic images, showing great potential in clinical diagnosis. However, existing PCCT methods require high radiation doses. This paper proposes a deep learning (DL) framework for low dose PCCT based on inter-contrast enhancement, utilizing the multi-contrast feature of PCCT and the varying effects of noise on each contrast. Experimental validation on grating-based PCCT demonstrates a significant quality improvement of multi-contrast tomographic images, indicating the potential of DL techniques in low dose PCCT.
Phase contrast computed tomography (PCCT) offers excellent imaging contrast on soft tissue while it generate absorption, phase and dark-field contrast tomographic images. It has shown a great potential in clinical diagnosis. However, existing PCCT methods require high radiation doses. Reducing tube current is a universal low dose approach while it will introduce quantum noise in projections. In this paper, we report a deep learning (DL) framework for low dose PCCT based on inter-contrast enhancement. It utilizes the multi-contrast feature of PCCT and the varying effects of noise on each contrast. The missing structure in the contrasts that are more affected by noise can be recovered by those that are less affected. Considering the grating-based PCCT as example, the proposed framework is validated with experiments and a dramatic quality improvement of multi-contrast tomographic images has been obtained. This study shows potential of DL techniques in the field of low dose PCCT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据