4.7 Article

Neighbor feature variance (NFV) based feature point selection method for three dimensional (3D) registration of space target

期刊

MEASUREMENT
卷 222, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113693

关键词

Space target; Point cloud registration; Point cloud resolution; Noise standard

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a method for feature points selection based on neighbor feature variance (NFV) to improve the accuracy of point clouds-based pose estimation for space targets, and applies corresponding algorithms in coarse and fine registration. Experimental results show that this method can effectively reduce errors.
Point clouds based three dimensional (3D) registration for the space target pose estimation requires high precision and noise robustness. To enhance the registration accuracy, a novel neighbor feature variance (NFV) based feature points selection method is proposed to provide the high precision input of point clouds based registration and promote the pose estimation accuracy of space targets. The proposed method generates more accurate correspondences by selecting the rank of all point's NFV, for removing the redundant points and remaining more salient points for accurate registration. In coarse registration, the truncated least squares estimation and semi definite relaxation (TEASER) algorithm is used to improve the accuracy of coarse registration and reduce the adverse effects caused by sparsity and noise of point cloud. In fine registration, the iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm is applied to estimate the pose transformation. The experimental results show that the maximum translation error and maximum rotation error are less than 0.019 m and 0.129 degrees, and the mean translation and rotation errors can be reduced by 69.85% and 60.58%, respectively. Compared to the registration without the optimization algorithm, the proposed method can be used for variable scale and high noise points based registration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据