4.6 Article

First-principles calculation of the electronic, optical, and photo-electrochemical properties of CaM2S4 (M = Sc, Y) compounds

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mssp.2023.107600

关键词

Electronic band-structure; Structural properties; First-principle investigation; Optoelectronic properties; Elastic constants

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the orthorhombic CaM2S4 (M = Sc, Y) structures were examined through first-principles calculations. The compounds were found to be mechanically stable with high stability under uniaxial deformation. Due to their small direct energy band gaps, they show potential as long-wave transparency materials. Additionally, CaM2S4 (M = Sc, Y) compounds exhibit good performance in photo-driven photocatalyst water splitting.
The orthorhombic CaM2S4 (M = Sc, Y) structures were investigated in the present work by first-principles cal-culations. CaM2S4 (M = Sc, Y) compounds are found to be mechanically stable with the anisotropic elastic constants that make them to be stable with respect to uniaxial deformation (Young's moduli are 73.724 and 57.441 GPa for CaSc2S4 and CaY2S4, respectively) but easy to be undergone to shear deformation (Poisson's ratios are 0.352 and 0.371 for CaSc2S4 and CaY2S4, respectively). Due to their relatively small direct energy band gaps (1.89 eV for CaSc2S4 and 2.26 eV for CaY2S4), the two compounds are intriguing candidates for long-wave transparency applications. The high hybridization degree of Ca-d, Y/Sc-d and S-p orbitals results in a wide energy range between the valence highest band and the conduction lowest band enabling these compounds to interact actively with visible and ultra-violet waves. The high absorption rate of 12-18 x 105 cm-1 and good hole-electron separation make CaM2S4 (M = Sc, Y) compounds to consider them good candidates for optoelec-tronic materials. Moreover, CaM2S4 (M = Sc, Y) compounds show good ability in the process of photo-driven photocatalyst water splitting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据