4.5 Article

High performing supercapacitors using Cr2O3 nanostructures with stable channels- theoretical and experimental insights

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mseb.2023.116438

关键词

Supercapacitors; Fick 's Law; Total Density of states (TDOS); Partial Density of states (PDOS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cr2O3 is a promising cathodic material for supercapacitor applications due to its fast redox kinetics, mesoporous structure, and high electrochemical stability. The unique cactus-like morphology of Cr2O3 particles obtained through a one-step synthesis improves the specific surface area and electrolyte ion diffusion, leading to enhanced capacitance values.
Cr2O3 is considered to be a promising cathodic material for supercapacitor applications on the account of its fast redox kinetics, mesoporous structure, and high electrochemical stability. Using a one-step synthesis of Cr2O3, a unique cactus-like morphology can be easily obtained. Such particles improve the specific surface area and electrolyte ion diffusion, leading to enhanced capacitance values. The prepared cactus-like (Cr2O3-c) particles are able to return a specific capacitance of 68 F/g at 5 mV s-1, in three-electrode measurement. This can be attributed to the redox couple of Cr4+/ Cr3+ displayed by Cr2O3 at the electrode-electrolyte interface. Further, the electrochemical performance of cactus-like Cr2O3 material (Cr2O3-c) and solid Cr2O3 spheres (Cr2O3-s) is also compared. This study proves that much superior performance is delivered by protruded nanoparticles. The spikes on the top of the particle surface ensures that two particles are well separated, which stimulates stable channels for ion intercalation-deintercalation. The physics can be explained using a modified free electron model for three-dimensional lattice. Further, using density functional theory (DFT) calculations the electronic band structure, density of states (DOS) and their influence on the electrochemical performance of Cr2O3 are evaluated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据