4.7 Article

Electron beam welding of L12-nanoparticle-strengthened strong and ductile medium-entropy alloys for cryogenic applications

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2023.145875

关键词

Medium-entropy alloys; Electron beam welding; Microstructure; Cryogenic temperature; Mechanical properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the weldability, microstructures, and mechanical properties of two L1(2)-nanoparticle-strengthened medium-entropy alloys after electron beam welding (EBW). The results show that strong yet ductile defect-free joints were produced, with larger grain sizes in the fusion zones compared to the heat-affected zones and base materials. Both EBWed MEAs exhibited high yield strengths, high ultimate tensile strengths, and good fracture strains at 77 K. The V-doping improved the cryogenic mechanical properties of the TMT MEA.
The weldability, microstructures, and mechanical properties of two L1(2)-nanoparticle-strengthened medium-entropy alloys (MEAs) Ni43.4Co25.3Cr25.3Al3Ti3 and Ni42.4Co24.3Cr24.3Al3Ti3V3 (at.%) are explored after electron beam welding (EBW). Strong yet ductile defect-free joints were produced with coarse columnar grains (118-245 mu m) in the fusion zones, which were larger than the equiaxed grains in the heat-affected zones (15.6-22.3 mu m) and in the base materials (4.6-5.6 mu m). Both EBWed MEAs showed high yield strengths (838-858 MPa), high ultimate tensile strengths (1416-1420 MPa), and good fracture strains of 20-21 % at 77 K, which are 66 similar to 83 %, 84-89 %, and 57-81 %, respectively, of those of the respective thermo-mechanically treated (TMT) MEAs. The V-doping improved the cryogenic mechanical properties of the TMT MEA while not influencing those of the EBWed MEA. High back-stress hardening contributes to over 50 % of the cryogenic strength. Both EBWed MEAs exhibited abundant dislocation networks, stacking faults, and nanoscale deformation twins after fracture, producing a high strain hardening rate and good ductility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据