4.4 Article

Rapid detection of G6PD mutations by multicolor melting curve analysis

期刊

MOLECULAR GENETICS AND METABOLISM
卷 119, 期 1-2, 页码 168-173

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2016.07.006

关键词

Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency; Multicolor melting curve analysis; Newborn screening; Real-time PCR

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province [2013J01355]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program [863 Programme] of China [2013AA020205]
  3. Guangxi Key Laboratory Project [15-140-11]
  4. Collaborative Innovation Center of Guangxi Biological Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The MeltPro G6PD assay is the first commercial genetic test for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency. This multicolor melting curve analysis -based real-time PCR assay is designed to genotype 16 G6PD mutations prevalent in the Chinese population. We comprehensively evaluated both the analytical and clinical performances of this assay. All 16 mutations were accurately genotyped, and the standard deviation of the measured T-m was <0.3 degrees C. The limit of detection was 1.0 ng/pL human genomic DNA. The assay could be run on four mainstream models of real-time PCR machines. The shortest running time (150 min) was obtained with LightCycler 480 II. A clinical study using 763 samples collected from three hospitals indicated that, of 433 samples with reduced G6PD activity, the MeltPro assay identified 423 samples as mutant, yielding a clinical sensitivity of 97.7% (423/433). Of the 117 male samples with normal G6PD activity, the MeltPro assay confirmed that 116 samples were wild type, yielding a clinical specificity of 99.1% (116/117). Moreover, the MeltPro assay demonstrated 100% concordance with DNA sequencing for all targeted mutations. We concluded that the MeltPro G6PD assay is useful as a diagnostic or screening tool for G6PD deficiency in clinical settings. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据