4.7 Article

Effects of shell scanning and build orientation on dynamic properties of laser powder bed fusion AlSi10Mg alloy

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2023.145521

关键词

AlSi10Mg; Dynamic mechanical properties; Split hopkinson bar; Shell scanning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on the dynamic mechanical properties of an AlSi10Mg alloy, finding that the shell of the sample impacts its mechanical behavior. Samples with a shell exhibit isotropic dynamic behavior, while machined samples display anisotropic dynamic behavior.
Additively manufactured (AM) products use two scanning strategies to create the central core region and the inner region near the free-surface circumference i.e. the shell. Manufacturers usually machine the shell to meet standard mechanical property testing. However, it's essential to determine how the shell affects an AM product's mechanical properties.This study focused on the dynamic tension and compression mechanical properties of an AlSi10Mg alloy made using the laser powder bed fusion technique.Machined and non-machined samples with and without shells of different build sizes and orientations underwent testing using split Hopkinson bar systems. Machined products displayed anisotropic dynamic behavior, favoring vertically built samples for maximum dynamic stress and horizontally built samples for elongation. However, samples with a shell showed apparent isotropic dynamic behavior due to pore distribution in the shell regime. The high porosity in the shell region resulted from the high intensity of heating energy input during scanning. Differences in shell shape between Z (load parallel to the direction of the building) and XY (load tangential to the direction of the building) samples and a slower, repeated laser scanning process in the shell region contributed to differences in porosity distribution between orientations. High porosity negatively impacted mechanical behavior and reduced dynamic mechanical properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据