4.6 Article

Silver-loaded tannic acid modified Ti3C2 catalyst to efficiently catalyze the degradation of dyes

期刊

MATERIALS RESEARCH BULLETIN
卷 167, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2023.112395

关键词

Tannic acid; Silver; Catalytic degradation; Dyes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ag@Ti3C2-TA nanocomposite catalyst was constructed using Ti3C2 as the carrier, tannic acid (TA) as the modifier, and silver nitrate as the precious metal precursor. The catalyst exhibited efficient catalytic degradation performance towards rhodamine B (RB) and methyl orange (MO), with degradation percentages increasing with the content of TA in the catalyst. The catalytic degradation process followed quasi-level kinetic model, with catalytic reaction rate constants of 0.972 and 1.478 min-1 for RB and MO, respectively. The catalytic stability of Ag@Ti3C2-TA remained high, with degradation percentages above 80% even after 10 catalytic cycles.
Ag@Ti3C2-TA nanocomposite catalyst was elaborately constructed by a simple and green method with Ti3C2 as the carrier, tannic acid (TA) as the modifier, and silver nitrate as the precious metal precursor. A series of characterizations were used to analyze morphology and microstructure of the resulting catalyst. The degradation behaviors of the catalyst were studied with rhodamine B (RB) and methyl orange (MO) as the model dyes. The result demonstrated that Ag@Ti3C2-TA exhibited efficient catalytic degradation performance toward both RB and MO, and the degradation percentage increased with the growth of TA content in the catalyst. The catalytic degradation process conformed to the quasi-level kinetic model, and catalytic reaction rate constants of Ag@Ti3C2-TA for RB and MO were 0.972 and 1.478 min-1, respectively. The catalytic degradation percentage of Ag@Ti3C2-TA toward RB and MO still remained above 80% even after 10 catalytic cycles, indicating high degradation percentage and considerable catalytic stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据