4.6 Article

Critical behavior of the cubic ErNi2 Laves compound nearby the Ferro-paramagnetic phase transition

期刊

MATERIALS RESEARCH BULLETIN
卷 164, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2023.112239

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, the critical behavior of the cubic Laves crystalline binary intermetallic compound ErNi2 near its second-order ferromagnetic to paramagnetic transition is analyzed. The second-order nature of the transition is confirmed by the normalized thermal dependencies of the magnetic entropy change curves and the Banerjee criterion. By comparing the normalized slopes, the Tricritical mean-field model is found to be the best model to calculate the critical exponent value of ErNi2. Using the modified Arrott plots, the final critical exponents are determined to be beta = 0.164(2) and gamma = 0.821(9), which closely match the Tricritical mean-field model with some slight differences. The accuracy and reliability of these exponents are further confirmed by the Widom scaling relation and the scaling hypothesis.
In this article, we analyze the critical behavior of the cubic Laves crystalline binary intermetallic compound ErNi2 near its second-order ferromagnetic (FM) to paramagnetic (PM) transition (6.9 K). Both the normalized thermal dependencies of the magnetic entropy change curves and the Banerjee criterion confirm the second order nature of the transition. By comparing the normalized slopes, we found that the Tricritical mean-field model is the best model to calculate the critical exponent value of ErNi2. Based on the modified Arrott plots, the final critical exponents are determined to be beta = 0.164(2) and gamma = 0.821(9), which are the closest to the Tricritical mean-field model, except for a litter differences. Moreover, the accuracy and reliability of these exponents were confirmed by both the Widom scaling relation and the scaling hypothesis. Our results provide new insight into understanding this compound's magnetic interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据