4.6 Article

To improve device performance of self-driven heterojunction photodetectors by inserting a thin layer of silver nanoparticles into the electron-transporting layer

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 306, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.128096

关键词

Colloidal quantum dots; Ag nanoparticles; Self-driven infrared photodetectors; Heterojunction interface; Electron-transporting layer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lead selenide colloidal quantum dots are widely used in infrared photodetectors. By constructing a heterojunction and inserting silver nanoparticles into the zinc oxide nanoparticles layer, the performance is greatly enhanced.
Lead selenide colloidal quantum dots (CQDs) are widely used in infrared photodetectors due to their size dependent bandgap tunability, facile solution-processing techniques and low cost. Heterojunctions (HJs) are usually used to construct device to facilitate the separation of excitons and the transportation of photogenerated carriers. Based on the solution-processed HJ photodetector ITO/ZnO/PbSe/Ag, in which PbSe CQDs layer acts as the active layer and ZnO nanoparticles (NPs) layer as the electron-transporting layer, a greatly enhanced performance was obtained after inserting 10 nm Ag NPs layer within the ZnO NPs layer close to the HJ ZnO/ PbSe interface. By optimizing the concentration of Ag NPs solutions and the location of Ag NPs thin layer in ZnO film, the maximum responsivity of the self-driven HJ photodetector ITO/ZnO(50 nm):Ag-NPs(10 nm):ZnO(50 nm)/PbSe(300 nm)/Ag reaches to 6.25 mA/W with a specific detectivity D* of 5.17 x1011 Jones under 8.5 & mu;W/ cm2 1550 nm illumination at zero bias. Further, the underlain physical mechanisms for the enhanced performance were discussed in details. In this way, it provides a very efficient method for enhanced performance self-driven HJ photodetectors by inserting a thin layer of metal NPs into the electron transporting layer close to the heterojunction interface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据