4.7 Article

Synergistic effect of transpassive film and gamma double prime phase on the electrochemical dissolution behavior of Inconel 718 manufactured by laser directed energy deposition

期刊

MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION
卷 204, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2023.113207

关键词

Additive manufacturing; Laser directed energy deposition; Inconel 718; Transpassive film; Electrochemical dissolution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the synergistic effect of transpassive film and gamma '' phase on the electrochemical dissolution behavior of Inconel 718 manufactured by laser directed energy deposition. The results showed that the incompact transpassive film induced local preferential dissolution, while the spatial distribution of the gamma '' phase restricted the expansion of pits, resulting in a better surface quality.
This study investigated the synergistic effect of transpassive film and gamma '' phase on the electrochemical dissolution behavior of Inconel 718 manufactured by laser directed energy deposition. The investigation was based on samples after homogenization and aging with (gamma + gamma '') phases and homogenization with. phase. The compositions of the transpassive films for two kinds of heat-treated samples were similar, mainly comprising porous Ni hydroxides. The incompact transpassive film induced the local preferential dissolution of the gamma matrix and generated multiple dispersive pits on the surface. Compared with the sample after homogenization, the spatial distribution of the gamma '' phase in the sample after homogenization and aging restricted the expansion of pits in the gamma matrix, leading to superior surface quality. The detachment of the gamma '' phase during electrochemical dissolution provided extra mass loss and higher current efficiency. A qualitative model was proposed to demonstrate the synergistic effect of the transpassive film and gamma '' phase on the dynamic electrochemical dissolution process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据