4.7 Article

Heterogeneous solid solutioning in carbon nanotube reinforced HfB2-ZrB2-SiC ultra high temperature ceramic composites

期刊

MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION
卷 201, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2023.112941

关键词

Ultra -high temperature ceramics; Spark plasma sintering; Microstructure; Thermal analysis; Solid solution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The role of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) in the solid solutioning of SiC reinforced HfB2 + ZrB2 has been studied. Incomplete solid solutioning was observed in the presence of 20% SiC under the given sintering conditions. However, the addition of CNTs resulted in the formation of heterogeneous solid solution, as confirmed by SEM, TEM, EDS analysis, and XRD peak de-convolution. The presence of CNTs and defect structures in the SiC phase were attributed to compressive stresses generated during the cooling process after sintering. With CNTs reinforcement, the micro-hardness and elastic modulus increased, while the oxidation resistance decreased.
Role of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) on solid solutioning in SiC reinforced equi-volume (40:40) composition of HfB2 + ZrB2 is investigated. Incomplete solid solutioning occurred under given sintering conditions in presence of 20 vol% SiC. However, CNTs addition resulted in heterogeneous solid solution formation which is evident from SEM and TEM micrographs and confirmed through EDS analysis and peak de-convolution in XRD. TEM investigation revealed the retention of CNTs and presence of defect structures like stacking faults in the SiC phase is ascribed to the compressive stresses generated during cooling after the sintering process. With CNTs reinforcement, micro-hardness and elastic modulus increased from 10.2 GPa to 11.7 GPa and 129 GPa to 141 GPa, respectively. The reduction in peak oxidation temperature (from 751-773 degrees C to 725-746 degrees C) and weight gain starting temperature (from 731-750 degrees C to 684-707 degrees C) with CNTs reinforcement elicits a concurrent reduction in the oxidation resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据