4.7 Article

Green laser powder bed fusion based fabrication and rate-dependent mechanical properties of copper lattices

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 231, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112023

关键词

Powder bed fusion; Copper; Lattice structures; Mechanical properties; Strain rate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the fabrication of copper lattice structures using green laser in laser-powder bed fusion, which have well-defined unit cells and dense microstructure. The deformation behavior of these structures under different strain rates is investigated and rationalized, suggesting their suitability for dynamic loading applications.
Additive manufacturing of pure copper (Cu) via laser-powder bed fusion (L-PBF) is challenging due to the low energy absorptivity under infra-red laser. As a result, 3-dimensional architectures, known for excellent load-bearing and energy absorption capabilities, have not been fabricated in pure Cu, so far. This study, for the first time, Cu lattice structures are fabricated through laser-powder bed fusion (L-PBF) with green laser (k = 515 nm). Structural and microstructural analysis confirm that the lattice structures consist of well-defined unit-cells and show dense microstructure. The deformation behavior is investigated under a wide range of strain rates from 0.001 /s to 1000 /s. The stress-strain curves exhibit a smooth and continuous deformation without any post-yield softening, which can be attributed to the intrinsic mechanical properties of Cu. Correlated with post-mortem microscopy examination, the ratedependent deformation behavior of pure Cu lattice structures is investigated and rationalized. The current work suggests that the complex Cu architectures can be fabricated by L-PBF with green laser and are suitable for dynamic loading applications.& COPY; 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据