4.7 Article

Antimicrobial effect of Streptococcus salivarius outer membrane-coated nanocomplexes against Candida albicans and oral candidiasis

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 233, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112177

关键词

Candida albicans; Cell membranes; Streptococcus salivarius; Biofilms; Nanoparticles

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a biomimetic adherent oral mucosal drug delivery system that effectively inhibited the formation of Candida albicans biofilms and the development of oral candidiasis. The system showed promising therapeutic potential for oral mucosal infections, including candidiasis.
Oral mucosal infection, especially oral candidiasis, is currently the most common oral mucosal disease. Traditional drug treatment regimens have difficulty adhering to mucous membranes, coupled with the unique anatomical and physiological characteristics of the oral cavity, thus reducing drug availability and limiting the effective time of drug action. Inspired by cell membrane-coated nanoparticles, this study aimed to construct a bionic adherent oral mucosal drug delivery system and investigated its therapeutic potential for oral candidiasis. The system was obtained by encapsulating Streptococcus salivarius K12 membranes on triclosan-loaded PLGA nanoparticles using an extrusion method. The constructed nanocomplexes (K12/TCS@PLGA-NPs) inherited the properties of the source cell membrane, bionically adhering to the oral mucosa and binding to the candida albicans hypha. Our in vitro and in vivo experiments have confirmed that K12/TCS@PLGA-NPs nanocomplexes significantly inhibits the formation of C. albicans biofilms and the development of oral candidiasis by enhancing the accumulation of drugs in lesions, optimizing drug efficacy. Furthermore, the biomimetic nanocomplexes could be considered safe and effective drug delivery systems, which hold considerable therapeutic promise for oral mucosal infections including candidiasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据