4.7 Article

Coumarin 6 staining method to detect microplastics

期刊

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
卷 193, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115167

关键词

Coumarin; Microplastic; Detection; Staining; Fluorescence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microplastics are a significant ocean pollutant and are widely spread across the globe. Hence, there is a need to enhance our understanding of microplastic levels in different environments. However, current detection methods for microplastics are labor-intensive and expensive. In this study, we developed a fluorescence staining technique using coumarin 6 and evaluated its efficacy. By using a mixture of acetone and ethanol as a solvent, we successfully stained 10 different types of plastics with coumarin 6. The fluorescence peak for coumarin 6 staining was around 500 nm for each plastic type. The optimal immersion time and coumarin 6 concentration for staining were found to be 60 min and 1 mg L-1, respectively. Using this technique, we were able to stain all microplastic samples collected from seawater in Tokyo Bay.
Microplastics have contaminated the ocean in large quantities and are widely distributed throughout the world. Thus, our understanding of the concentration of microplastics in various environments should be increased. However, current methods to detect microplastics require considerable effort and expensive equipment. In this study, we developed a fluorescence staining technique using coumarin 6 and examined its effectiveness. A mixture of acetone and ethanol was used as the solvent, and 10 different types of plastics were able to be stained with coumarin 6. The fluorescence peak for coumarin 6 staining was approximately 500 nm for each plastic type. The optimal immersion time and coumarin 6 concentration for staining were determined to be 60 min and 1 mg L-1, respectively. Using this technique, we were able to stain all of the microplastics obtained from samples collected in Tokyo Bay seawater.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据