4.7 Article

Behavioral and physiological effects of ocean acidification and warming on larvae of a continental shelf bivalve

期刊

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
卷 192, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115048

关键词

Ocean acidification; Ocean warming; Bivalve larvae; Surfclam; Behavior; Energy budget

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the impacts of ocean warming and acidification on larval Atlantic surfclams. Results show that ocean warming increases feeding, growth and biomineralization, but decreases swimming speed and pelagic larval duration. Ocean acidification increases respiration but reduces immune performance and biomineralization. Additionally, changes in energy allocation and profiles of responses are observed under climate change.
The negative impacts of ocean warming and acidification on bivalve fisheries are well documented but few studies investigate parameters relevant to energy budgets and larval dispersal. This study used laboratory experiments to assess developmental, physiological and behavioral responses to projected climate change scenarios using larval Atlantic surfclams Spisula solidissima solidissima, found in northwest Atlantic Ocean continental shelf waters. Ocean warming increased feeding, scope for growth, and biomineralization, but decreased swimming speed and pelagic larval duration. Ocean acidification increased respiration but reduced immune performance and biomineralization. Growth increased under ocean warming only, but decreased under combined ocean warming and acidification. These results suggest that ocean warming increases metabolic activity and affects larval behavior, while ocean acidification negatively impacts development and physiology. Additionally, principal component analysis demonstrated that growth and biomineralization showed similar response profiles, but inverse response profiles to respiration and swimming speed, suggesting alterations in energy allocation under climate change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据