4.7 Article

Pollution status determination using trace metals and organic contaminants of the water column in coastal areas of the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aqaba: A baseline assessment

期刊

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
卷 194, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115379

关键词

Pollution assessment; Trace metals; PAH; TPH; Saudi Arabian coastal marine areas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides a baseline assessment of water pollution in the coastal areas of Saudi Arabia by analyzing trace metals (Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn), total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in seawater samples collected from 71 sampling stations in June-July 2021. The highest concentrations of Co, Cu, and Ni were found in Al-Shuqaiq, while the Jeddah lagoon waters had the highest concentrations of Pb and Zn. Elevated concentrations of TPHs and PAHs were observed in the surface waters of Al Lith, Jeddah lagoon, and Jeddah Mena. However, all trace metals, TPHs, and individual PAHs analyzed in this study were below the environmental standards set by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Herein, we aim to provide a baseline assessment of the pollution status of the water column in coastal areas of Saudi Arabia (Red Sea and the Gulf of Aqaba), using trace metals (Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn), total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), in seawater samples obtained from 71 sampling stations in June-July 2021. Concerning trace metals, the maximum concentrations for Co, Cu and Ni were detected in Al-Shuqaiq, whereas the highest Pb and Zn concentrations were found in the Jeddah lagoon waters. Elevated concentrations of TPHs and the highest sum of PAHs were recorded in surface waters of Al Lith, Jeddah lagoon and Jeddah Mena. Overall, the concentrations of all trace metals, TPHs and individual PAHs for which environmental standards have been stipulated for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia fall well below the threshold values.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据