4.5 Article

No Increased Mercury Release from Dental Restorations at 1.5T, 3T, or 7T MRI

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29872

关键词

7 Tesla; dental amalgam; magnetic resonance imaging; MRI safety

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that MRI does not significantly increase mercury excretion from dental amalgam at 1.5T, 3T, or 7T field strengths, both for laboratory restorations and for those placed and lived with prior to extraction and scanning, demonstrating no added risk to the clinical patient or research subject.
Purpose: Dental amalgam contains mercury and is commonly used in dental restorations. The impact of MRI on mercury excretion from dental amalgam is notwell understood across clinical field strengths, especially 7T. We investigated the effects ofMRI exposure onmercury excretion using fresh, lab-created dental amalgam restorations and in extracted teeth with old, pre- existing restorations. Methods: Donated, unfilled human teeth (n= 120) were restored with amalgam before being stored in saline, artificial saliva, or a dry box prior to MRI scanning. The teeth were placed in individual tubes of fresh artificial saliva and scanned at 1.5T, 3T, or 7T or left unscanned as controls. Mercury concentrations were measured 24-30 h later. Donated teeth with pre- existing restorations (n= 40) were stored in artificial saliva, scanned at 7T or left unscanned as controls, and mercury concentration tested. Results: For teeth extracted and restored in a laboratory, no significant difference was found (F= 2.42, P = 0.072) between mean mercury concentrations of unscanned teeth (13.72 mu g/L) and teeth scanned at 1.5T (10.88 mu g/L), 3T (12.65 mu g/L), or 7T (8.88 mu g/L). For teeth extracted with previously placed restorations, no significant difference (P = 0.288) was found between unscanned controls (4.28 mu g/L) and teeth scanned at 7T (6.63 mu g/L). Conclusion: MRI of dental amalgam does not significantly increase mercury excretion at 1.5T, 3T, or 7T compared to unscanned teeth. This holds true for controlled laboratory restorations as well as for those placed and lived with prior to extraction and scanning, demonstrating no added risk to the clinical patient or research subject.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据