4.7 Review

Natural history collections as windows on evolutionary processes

期刊

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
卷 25, 期 4, 页码 864-881

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mec.13529

关键词

environmental change; evolution; genomics; morphology; natural history collections; phenotypic change

资金

  1. Museum of Vertebrate Zoology
  2. Department of Integrative Biology
  3. Graduate School at the University of California, Berkeley
  4. NSF GK-12 grant
  5. U.C. Berkeley
  6. NSF-DEB [1120356]
  7. NIH RO1 [GM074245]
  8. Direct For Biological Sciences
  9. Division Of Environmental Biology [1120356] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural history collections provide an immense record of biodiversity on Earth. These repositories have traditionally been used to address fundamental questions in biogeography, systematics and conservation. However, they also hold the potential for studying evolution directly. While some of the best direct observations of evolution have come from long-term field studies or from experimental studies in the laboratory, natural history collections are providing new insights into evolutionary change in natural populations. By comparing phenotypic and genotypic changes in populations through time, natural history collections provide a window into evolutionary processes. Recent studies utilizing this approach have revealed some dramatic instances of phenotypic change over short timescales in response to presumably strong selective pressures. In some instances, evolutionary change can be paired with environmental change, providing a context for potential selective forces. Moreover, in a few cases, the genetic basis of phenotypic change is well understood, allowing for insight into adaptive change at multiple levels. These kinds of studies open the door to a wide range of previously intractable questions by enabling the study of evolution through time, analogous to experimental studies in the laboratory, but amenable to a diversity of species over longer timescales in natural populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据