4.7 Article

Micellization of Diblock Copolymers in Polymeric Solvents

期刊

MACROMOLECULES
卷 56, 期 17, 页码 6848-6858

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.3c00283

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the micellization behavior of A-B diblock copolymers in polymeric solvents was investigated using dilute solution thermodynamics. The micellization point was found to be a universal function, and both the micelle density profile and the interfacial thickness showed universal behaviors.
We study micellization for A-B diblock copolymers of length N-1 with the volume fraction of the insoluble block f(B) in A polymeric solvents of length N by dilute solution thermodynamics. For short-chain solvents, the micelle is wet, and the critical micelle condition is given by (chi N)(c.m). - 1/2 similar to (f(B)N(1))N--1/2(1/2) with the optimal aggregation number at the transition m(c.m.)* similar to N(1/2)p(3/2)(p=b(2)/v(0)(2/3) is the stiffness parameter), in agreement with the extended Lifshitz theory. However, the micellization point for the dry micelle is (chi N)(c.m). - 1/2 similar to (f(B)N(1))N-1 with m(c.m.)* similar to (f(B)N(1))(1/2)p(3/2) in the long-chain solvents. A theoretical analysis shows that the micellization point is a universal function of the apparent scaling variable x(m) equivalent to N/f(B)N(1). Interestingly, on combining the scaling behavior of m(c.m.)*, (chi N)(c.m.) shows a universal scaling behavior with an intrinsic scaling variable x equivalent to (pN)(3/2)/m*f(B)N(1), which has a clear physical meaning as the ratio between the pervaded volume of the polymeric solvent and the physical volume of the micellar core. In addition, after proper nondimensionalizing, the micelle density profile and the interfacial thickness at the micellization point also show universal behaviors with both x(m) and x. Importantly, micelles with several to thousands of chains show great potential for application in drug and gene delivery diagnostics, nanoreactors, and microcapsules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据