4.7 Article

Combining Alginate/PVPI-Based Film with Frequency Rhythmic Electrical Modulation System (FREMS) Technology as an Advanced Strategy for Diabetic Wounds

期刊

MACROMOLECULAR BIOSCIENCE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/mabi.202300349

关键词

chronic wounds; electrical stimulation; FREMS technology; treating diabetic ulcers; wound dressings

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates that the combination of Alginate/PVPI-based wound dressing and electrical neurostimulation devices can be a new approach to improve chronic wound treatment in diabetic patients.
Diabetes is rising as one of the most diffused diseases of the century with the related urgent necessity to face its systemic and local effects on the patients, such as cardiovascular problems, degeneration of limbs, and dysfunction of the wound healing process. The diffusion of leg ulcers has been estimated to be 1.51 for 1000 population, and these non-resolved wounds can produce several social, economic, and mental health issues in diabetic patients. At the same time, these people experience neuropathic pain that causes morbidity and a further decrease in their quality of life. Here, a new study is presented where asodium alginate/Polyvinylpyrrolidone-Iodine complex (PVPI)-based wound dressing is combined with the Frequency Rhythmic Electrical Modulation System (FREMS) technology, an established medical device for the treatment of neuropathic pain and diabetic ulcers. The produced Alginate/PVPI-based films are characterized in terms of morphology, chemistry, wettability, bio-/hemo-compatibility, and clotting capacity. Next, the Alginate/PVPI-based films are used together with FREMS technology in diabetic mice models, and synergism of their action in the wound closure rate and anti-inflammatory properties is found. Hence, how the combination of electrical neurostimulation devices and advanced wound dressings can be a new approach to improve chronic wound treatment is demonstrated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据