4.5 Article

A machine learning strategy for the identification of key in silico descriptors and prediction models for IgG monoclonal antibody developability properties

期刊

MABS
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2023.2248671

关键词

Biophysical; computational; descriptors; developability; IgG1; machine learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Identification of favorable biophysical properties for protein therapeutics is crucial for preclinical development. Predicting these properties and bioassay results from computational features has potential to reduce time and cost, but remains a challenge. This study demonstrates an automated machine learning workflow using physiochemical features to generate predictive models for key developability endpoints. The discovered features validate previous literature and suggest directions for further research and model improvement.
Identification of favorable biophysical properties for protein therapeutics as part of developability assessment is a crucial part of the preclinical development process. Successful prediction of such properties and bioassay results from calculated in silico features has potential to reduce the time and cost of delivering clinical-grade material to patients, but nevertheless has remained an ongoing challenge to the field. Here, we demonstrate an automated and flexible machine learning workflow designed to compare and identify the most powerful features from computationally derived physiochemical feature sets, generated from popular commercial software packages. We implement this workflow with medium-sized datasets of human and humanized IgG molecules to generate predictive regression models for two key developability endpoints, hydrophobicity and poly-specificity. The most important features discovered through the automated workflow corroborate several previous literature reports, and newly discovered features suggest directions for further research and potential model improvement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据