4.7 Article

How do the phenolics and amino acids affect the antioxidant, antidiabetic and antiglycation properties of selected fruit powders?

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 189, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2023.115454

关键词

Food powders; Phenolics; Amino acids; alpha-amylase activity; alpha-glucosidase activity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the role of phenolics and amino acids from fruits like Japanese quince, rosehip, haskap berry, and blackcurrant in modifying the antioxidant, antidiabetic, and antiglycation potential of freeze-dried powders. The results highlight the importance of the composition of phenolics and amino acids in determining the functional properties of powdered fruit products.
Fruit matrix modification caused by processing determines the reactivity of bioactives. In line with a new trend in foods development and nutrition, the study endeavored to recognize contribution of phenolics and amino acids from selected raw materials, i.e., Japanese quince, rosehip, haskap berry and blackcurrant in moderation of antioxidant, antidiabetic and antiglycation potential of freeze-dried powders. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of phenolics and amino acids was performed for powdered fruit, pomace, juice and sugar-free juice products considered as different matrices. Phenolics' groups differently influenced antidiabetic activity depending on the composition of the matrix in which they were present. Flavonols affected the ability to inhibit advanced glycation end products (AGEs) derived from methylglyoxal and L-arginine. The involvement of individual amino acids in antioxidant capacity was identified, pointing to ornithine presence as the most influential one. Free radical scavenging activity of freeze-dried powders contributed to effectiveness as AGEs inhibitors. Results provided an insight for powdered fruit product development, stressing that composition of fruit-based matrix is a key point for creation of potential functional properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据