4.7 Article

A new strategy for magnetic immobilized phospholipase A1 and its application in soybean oil degumming: Multipoint covalent binding

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 186, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2023.115181

关键词

Chitosan; Multipoint covalent; Magnetic carrier; Phospholipase A 1; Degumming

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a method of multipoint immobilized phospholipase A1 (PLA1) was proposed for degumming of crude soybean oil. The PLA1 was magnetically immobilized on a modified aldehyde-rich chitosan carrier, which exhibited high enzymatic load and good stability. This method achieved effective degumming and reduced phosphorus content in the oil.
In order to achieve better degumming of crude soybean oil and reduce the phosphorus content in oil, a method of multipoint immobilized phospholipase A1 (PLA1) was proposed for degumming. PLA1 with a high enzymatic load and good stability was magnetically immobilized on a modified aldehyde-rich chitosan carrier by changing the pH. The aldehyde content of the activated carrier reached 288 mu mol/g. The optimal conditions of the magnetic carrier and PLA1 multi-point covalent binding were as follows: PLA1 additive amount 6000 U/ml, group ratio 7:1, reaction at 50 degrees C for 3.0 h. According to the characterization analysis, PLA1 was essentially spherical with good dispersion, the particle size was 83 nm, and the XRD pattern was similar to the conventional one. After functional group analysis, spectral peaks, such as C--O and Fe-O, appeared, which proved that PLA1 was suc-cessfully fixed on the carrier with a saturation magnetization of 23.68 emu/g. The optimum temperature of covalent and multipoint immobilized PLA1 was 60 degrees C, with an optimum pH of 7.0 and 6.5 and an enzyme loading of 115 and 128 mg/g, respectively. The phosphorus content was 35.09 mg/kg by multipoint immobilized PLA1. After eight cycles of repeated use, the relative activity of the immobilized PLA1 was still more than 80%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据