4.7 Article

Biologically active selenium nanoparticles composited with Bacillus licheniformis extracellular polymeric substances fermented from cane molasses

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 187, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2023.115255

关键词

Selenium nanoparticles; Bacillus licheniformis; Extracellular polymeric substances; Cane molasses; Biological activity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organic selenium nanoparticles (EPS-SeNPs) were synthesized using extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) fermented from waste cane molasses, and exhibited good stability, antibacterial activity, and antioxidant activity.
Organic selenium nanoparticles (SeNPs) are attracting great interest due to their unique properties and potential applications in the food industry. In this study, a novel form of SeNPs was synthesized by using Bacillus licheniformis CGMCC 2876 extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) fermented from waste cane molasses. The morphology of EPS-SeNPs was spherical with an average size of 141.8 nm and a zeta potential of-51.77 mV, and the concentration of Se reached 107.43 mg/g. Additionally, the EPS-SeNPs exhibited good stability in aqueous solution for 7 days and were resistant to the digestion of simulated gastric fluid. The zero-valent Se composition and C-OMIDLINE HORIZONTAL ELLIPSISSe asymmetric stretch were characterized in the EPS-SeNPs. A synthesis mechanism of EPS-SeNPs was hypothesized. Moreover, the biological activities of the EPS-SeNPs synthesized from EPS were evaluated. The EPS-SeNPs exhibit antioxidant activity in scavenging (OH)-O-center dot, DPPH and & sdot;O(2- )free radicals with abilities <90% in the range of 0.25-4 g/L and inhibit 50% of formed radicals (IC50) values of 1.18, 13.71 and 1.93 g/L, respec-tively. EPS-SeNPs also exhibit excellent antibacterial activity, which could inhibit the growth of intestinal pathogenic gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria (>80%) in vitro with the EPS-SeNPs concentrations higher than 1000 mu g/mL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据