4.3 Article

Tribological performance of polymeric friction modifiers under sliding rolling contact condition

期刊

LUBRICATION SCIENCE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ls.1678

关键词

film thickness; friction; GPC; polymeric friction modifiers; SEM-EDX; ToF-SIMS; wear

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tribological performance of two polymeric friction modifiers, one based on an ester-based compound and another based on an ethoxylated fatty ester and an organic friction modifier, oleamide, was studied. The results showed that the polymeric friction modifier exhibited lower friction and wear than the oleamide at all the studied temperatures, and it reduced boundary friction more effectively at higher temperature.
The tribological performance of two polymeric friction modifiers, one based on an ester-based compound and another based on an ethoxylated fatty ester and an organic friction modifier, oleamide, was studied at 50, 90 and 140 degrees C using a Mini Traction Machine equipped with optical interferometry and electrical contact resistance. The ability to form surface film is found to vary among the friction modifiers and with temperature and rubbing duration. Despite a thinner film being formed, polymeric friction modifier (PFMs) exhibited lower friction and wear than oleamide at all the studied temperatures. Further, the PFMs reduced boundary friction more effectively at higher temperature. In accordance with lower boundary friction, a smoother surface topography characterized by low wear was exhibited by PFM lubricated surfaces at higher temperatures. Scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive x-ray analysis and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry provided insights on the tribofilm formation. The improvement in the tribological performance of PFMs is attributed to temperature-induced conformation transition of adsorbed polymer chains on the surface. The results are corroborated by data obtained from dynamic light scattering and gel permeation chromatography.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据