4.8 Article

High-Q and Strong Chiroptical Responses in Planar Metasurfaces Empowered by Mie Surface Lattice Resonances

期刊

LASER & PHOTONICS REVIEWS
卷 17, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/lpor.202300186

关键词

circular dichroism; Mie surface lattice resonances; optical chirality; planar metasurfaces

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes and demonstrates chiral all-dielectric metasurfaces based on Mie surface lattice resonances (SLRs) with high quality factors and strong chirality. The high-Q and strong chirality are achieved by perturbing the lattice and tilting the incidence angle. These findings provide a new direction for realizing high-performance chiral metasurfaces and have great potential in biochemical sensing, emission or lasing, and nonlinear optics.
Planar chiral metasurfaces have emerged as a versatile platform for manipulating chiral light-matter interactions in diverse applications. However, it remains challenging to achieve high quality factors together with strong chirality. Here, chiral all-dielectric metasurfaces with a high Q factor of 1220 and relatively large planar chirality of circular dichroism -0.37 under normal incidence, or with a high Q factor of 872 and large extrinsic 3D chirality of circular dichroism 0.7, based on Mie surface lattice resonances (SLRs) are proposed and experimentally demonstrated. Both SLR-induced planar chirality under normal incidence and SLR-assisted extrinsic 3D chirality under oblique incidence are achieved by perturbing the square lattice and by slightly tilting the incidence angle, respectively. It shows that the high-Q and strong chirality arises from the different excitation efficiencies of Mie SLRs under the incidences of left- and right-handed circularly polarized light. With these findings, this study provides a new direction for realizing high-performance chiral metasurfaces and holds great promise for chiral nanophotonic applications in biochemical sensing, emission or lasing, and nonlinear optics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据