4.8 Article

Planned delivery or expectant management for late preterm pre-eclampsia in low-income and middle-income countries (CRADLE-4): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial

期刊

LANCET
卷 402, 期 10399, 页码 386-396

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00688-8

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of planned delivery between 34+0 and 36+6 weeks' gestation in reducing maternal mortality and morbidity without increasing perinatal complications in India and Zambia. The results showed that planned delivery did not significantly differ from expectant management in terms of maternal outcomes, but was non-inferior in terms of perinatal outcomes. Planned delivery also reduced the risk of severe maternal hypertension and stillbirth. Therefore, planned delivery from 34 weeks' gestation should be considered as an intervention to reduce pre-eclampsia associated mortality and morbidity in low-income or middle-income countries.
Background Pre-eclampsia is a leading cause of maternal and perinatal mortality. Evidence regarding interventions in a low-income or middle-income setting is scarce. We aimed to evaluate whether planned delivery between 34+0 and 36+6 weeks' gestation can reduce maternal mortality and morbidity without increasing perinatal complications in India and Zambia. Methods In this parallel-group, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial, we compared planned delivery versus expectant management in women with pre-eclampsia from 34+0 to 36+6 weeks' gestation. Participants were recruited from nine hospitals and referral facilities in India and Zambia and randomly assigned to planned delivery or expectant management in a 1:1 ratio by a secure web-based randomisation facility hosted by MedSciNet. Randomisation was stratified by centre and minimised by parity, single-fetus pregnancy or multi-fetal pregnancy, and gestational age. The primary maternal outcome was a composite of maternal mortality or morbidity with a superiority hypothesis. The primary perinatal outcome was a composite of one or more of: stillbirth, neonatal death, or neonatal unit admission of more than 48 h with a non-inferiority hypothesis (margin of 10% difference). Analyses were by intention to treat, with an additional per-protocol analysis for the perinatal outcome. The trial was prospectively registered with ISRCTN, 10672137. The trial is closed to recruitment and all follow-up has been completed. Findings Between Dec 19, 2019, and March 31, 2022, 565 women were enrolled. 284 women (282 women and 301 babies analysed) were allocated to planned delivery and 281 women (280 women and 300 babies analysed) were allocated to expectant management. The incidence of the primary maternal outcome was not significantly different in the planned delivery group (154 [55%]) compared with the expectant management group (168 [60%]; adjusted risk ratio [RR] 0 & BULL;91, 95% CI 0 & BULL;79 to 1 & BULL;05). The incidence of the primary perinatal outcome by intention to treat was non-inferior in the planned delivery group (58 [19%]) compared with the expectant management group (67 [22%]; adjusted risk difference -3 & BULL;39%, 90% CI -8 & BULL;67 to 1 & BULL;90; non-inferiority p<0 & BULL;0001). The results from the per-protocol analysis were similar. There was a significant reduction in severe maternal hypertension (adjusted RR 0 & BULL;83, 95% CI 0 & BULL;70 to 0 & BULL;99) and stillbirth (0 & BULL;25, 0 & BULL;07 to 0 & BULL;87) associated with planned delivery. There were 12 serious adverse events in the planned delivery group and 21 in the expectant management group. Interpretation Clinicians can safely offer planned delivery to women with late preterm pre-eclampsia, in a low-income or middle-income country. Planned delivery reduces stillbirth, with no increase in neonatal unit admissions or neonatal morbidity and reduces the risk of severe maternal hypertension. Planned delivery from 34 weeks' gestation should therefore be considered as an intervention to reduce pre-eclampsia associated mortality and morbidity in these settings. Funding UK Medical Research Council and Indian Department of Biotechnology. Copyright & COPY; 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据