4.3 Article

Northern bobwhite breeding season and nest survival are greater on native grasslands

期刊

JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.22493

关键词

breeding season; Colinus virginianus; habitat management; native grasslands; nest survival; Northern bobwhite

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the impact of management strategies and land cover on the population dynamics of northern bobwhites. The findings suggest that environmental factors such as land cover composition, woody cover, and management actions influence the breeding season survival of both adult and nest bobwhites.
Northern bobwhites (Colinus virginianus) are declining across their range. Population recovery requires a better understanding of the influence of management strategies and land cover on specific demographic components of full annual cycle population dynamics. We used known-fate daily survival models to relate adult breeding season survival and nest survival to land cover composition, woody cover, and management actions on 5 study sites in southwest Missouri, USA. We collected 3,516 observations of daily nest survival from 364 bobwhite nests for 7,509 exposure days and 34,386 observations of adult survival from 955 bobwhites for 85,225 exposure days during breeding seasons in 2014-2018. The most supported model for nest and adult breeding season survival included environmental covariates for percent native grass and agricultural cover, distance to shrub, and distance to tree. Both nest and adult breeding season survival were positively related to distance to trees. Nest survival was negatively related to percent agricultural crop cover. Areal nest and adult breeding season survival were greater on native grassland sites compared to conservation areas that maintained small units of strip crop and wooded cover. Management to sustain or expand native grass cover and reduce tree cover should benefit bobwhite nest survival and adult breeding season survival in the landscapes we studied.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据