4.1 Article

RABIES VIRUS SEROSURVEY OF THE SMALL INDIAN MONGOOSE (URVA AUROPUNCTATA) ACROSS MULTIPLE HABITATS IN PUERTO RICO, 2014-21

期刊

JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES
卷 59, 期 4, 页码 577-589

出版社

WILDLIFE DISEASE ASSOC, INC
DOI: 10.7589/JWD-D-22-00148

关键词

Habitat; mongoose; Puerto Rico; rabies; rabies virus-neutralizing antibodies; serology; Urva auropunctata

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The small Indian mongoose is a major reservoir for rabies in Puerto Rico, accounting for over 70% of reported animal rabies cases annually. A serosurvey conducted in 11 sites across Puerto Rico revealed that the presence of rabies virus-neutralizing antibodies in mongooses varied by habitat and had some influence of sex at the individual level. These findings can contribute to understanding rabies virus transmission and inform rabies management activities in Puerto Rico.
The small Indian mongoose (Urva auropuncata) is a rabies reservoir in Puerto Rico and accounts for over 70% of reported animal rabies cases annually. The presence of rabies virus-neutralizing antibodies (RVNA) is often used as a tool to measure exposure to rabies virus in wildlife populations. We conducted a serosurvey of mongooses at 11 sites representing six habitat types across Puerto Rico. We collected a serum sample from 464 individual mongooses during 2014-21. Overall, 80/464 (17.0%; 95% confidence interval, 14.1-20.9%; 55 male, 23 female, and two sexes not recorded) of individual mongooses sampled across all habitats were RVNA positive. The geometric mean (SD) RVNA titer for 80 unique seropositive animals was 0.58 (2.92) IU/mL. Our models indicated that the probability of mongooses being RVNA seropositive mostly varied by habitat, with some influence of sex in the individual-level analyses. Population-level RVNA seroprevalence is dynamic in mongoose populations, but these data may shed light on rabies virus transmission across regions to help inform rabies management activities in Puerto Rico.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据