4.6 Article

TASTNet: An end-to-end deep fingerprinting net with two-dimensional attention mechanism and spatio-temporal weighted fusion for video content authentication

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvcir.2023.103913

关键词

Robust video fingerprinting; Discrimination; Two-dimensional attention; Spatio-temporal fusion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a robust fingerprinting scheme for video content authentication. It extracts key spatio-temporal features from the input video and maps them to the corresponding fingerprint using a two-dimensional attention mechanism and spatio-temporal weighted fusion. Experimental results show that the proposed scheme achieves superior performances in terms of robustness and discrimination.
In this paper, a robust fingerprinting scheme for video content authentication with two-dimensional attention mechanism and spatio-temporal weighted fusion called TASTNet is proposed, which can automatically extracts key spatio-temporal features from the input video and maps them to the corresponding fingerprint. Detailedly, the two-dimensional attention mechanism is applied to resist different kinds of digital manipulations for robustness enhancement. To incorporate perceptual characteristics, a spatio-temporal weighted fusion method based on LTSM is presented to integrate frame-level features into video-level features while retaining the temporal order. In the process of fusion, key frames are allocated with larger weights according to inter-frame correlation. With these two steps, we can obtain representative video features that contain principal perception information. In addition, the proposed scheme utilizes deep metric learning for training, and we design multiple constraints to make the generated fingerprint more compact and discriminable. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our scheme can achieve superior performances with respect to robustness and discrimination compared with some state-of-the-art schemes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据