4.4 Article

Approaches to produce and characterize recombinant protein VP1-2A of HAV for serological rapid test application

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS
卷 323, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2023.114839

关键词

Hepatitis A virus; HAV VP1-2A protein; Purification; Diagnosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on improving the purification, solubility, and protein expression levels of recombinant VP1-2A, a hepatitis A virus (HAV) structural protein with immunogenic activity. The results show that the modified approach successfully produces biologically active HAV VP1-2A, which can be used as a diagnostic tool for HAV infection.
Studies reporting the expression of hepatitis A virus (HAV) structural proteins, specifically recombinant VP1-2A containing an immunogenic activity, use the Escherichia coli system. Recombinant HAV proteins may represent a source of less expensive antigens for application in different diagnostic platforms. However, the formation of insoluble aggregates is an obstacle to obtaining large amounts of HAV proteins in their native form. To overcome this obstacle, some approaches were applied in this study to improve purification, solubility, and protein expression levels. Critical properties were evaluated. The introduction of another insertion codon to increase the protein concentration and vector activity was observed and verified by SDS-PAGE. The expression was established with 0.4 mM IPTG for 4 h at 37 degrees C. The VP1 protein was partially soluble at an isoeletric point (pI) of 6.45. The majority of HAV VP1-2A proteins measured 45.19 kDa in size and had a homogeneity of 53.58%. Multiantigen print immunoassay (MAPIA) showed antigenicity at different HAV VP1-2A concentrations, and microsphere-based immunoassays showed a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 84%. HAV VP1-2A was characterized using different sensitivity methods to prove its biological activity, indicating its use as a tool for the diagnosis of Hepatitis A virus infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据