4.6 Article

FTY720 (Fingolimod) Inhibits HIF1 and HIF2 Signaling, Promotes Vascular Remodeling, and Chemosensitizes in Renal Cell Carcinoma Animal Model

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS
卷 15, 期 10, 页码 2465-2474

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0167

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer (Equipe Labellisee LIGUE)
  2. Fondation de France
  3. Bourse Angiogenese from Roche
  4. Universite de Toulouse
  5. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale (PhD fellowship)
  6. Fondation ARC (PhD fellowship)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is characterized by intratumoral hypoxia and chemoresistance. The hypoxia-inducible factors HIF1 alpha and HIF2 alpha play a crucial role in ccRCC initiation and progression. We previously identified the sphingosine kinase 1/sphingosine 1-phosphate (SphK1/S1P) pathway as a new modulator of HIF1 alpha and HIF2 alpha under hypoxia in various cancer cell models. Here, we report that FTY720, an inhibitor of the S1P signaling pathway, inhibits both HIF1 alpha and HIF2 alpha accumulation in several human cancer cell lines. In a ccRCC heterotopic xenograft model, we show that FTY720 transiently decreases HIF1 alpha and HIF2 alpha intratumoral level and modifies tumor vessel architecture within 5 days of treatment, suggesting a vascular normalization. In mice bearing subcutaneous ccRCC tumor, FTY720 and a gemcitabine-based chemotherapy alone display a limited effect, whereas, in combination, there is a significant effect on tumor size without toxicity. Noteworthy, administration of FTY720 for 5 days before chemotherapy is not associated with a more effective tumor control, suggesting a mode of action mainly independent of the vascular remodeling. In conclusion, these findings demonstrate that FTY720 could successfully sensitize ccRCC to chemotherapy and establish this molecule as a potent therapeutic agent for ccRCC treatment, independently of drug scheduling. (C) 2016 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据