4.7 Article

MHD mixed convection of non-Newtonian power-law ferrofluid in a wavy enclosure

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-023-12485-7

关键词

Mixed convection; Non-Newtonian ferrofluid; Wavy cavity; Finite volume method; Rate of heat transfer; Entropy production

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on the numerical simulation of magnetohydrodynamic mixed convection and entropy formation in a wavy enclosure filled with non-Newtonian power-law ferrofluid. The results show that the mean Nusselt number increases with a decrease in the Hartmann number and an increase in the Reynolds number, power-law index, and ferroparticle volume fraction. The total entropy production is reduced by raising the Hartmann number.
The present study focuses on numerical simulations of magnetohydrodynamic mixed convection and entropy formation in a lid-driven wavy enclosure filled with non-Newtonian power-law ferrofluid. The physical model is a two-dimensional wavy square chamber with thermally adiabatic horizontal boundaries, while the right and left vertical walls maintain a constant temperature of the T-C and T-H, respectively. For mapping the wavy domain to a simple square domain the Cartesian curvilinear coordinates are used. The governing equations are solved using the finite volume method to explore the mixed convection characteristics in terms of heat transport, velocity, streamlines, isotherms, and entropy formation. Pertinent non-dimensional parameters, such as the Reynolds number (Re), Hartmann number (Ha), power-law index (n), ferroparticle volume fraction (phi), and a fixed Prandtl number (Pr = 6.8377), are used for the numerical simulation. According to the findings, the mean Nusselt numbers ((Nu) over bar) grow when Ha is reduced and Re, n and phi are augmented, and the highest magnitude of (Nu) over bar is found, while 4% ferroparticles are added to the base fluid. The influence of key variables on total entropy production (E-s)(t) reduced by raising Ha.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据