4.6 Article

Suppression of SRC Signaling Is Effective in Reducing Synergy between Glioblastoma and Stromal Cells

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS
卷 15, 期 7, 页码 1535-1544

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-1011

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Lead Discovery Siena (LDS, Siena, Italy)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glioblastoma cells efficiently interact with and infiltrate the surrounding normal tissue, rendering surgical resection and adjuvant chemo/radiotherapy ineffective. New therapeutic targets, able to interfere with glioblastoma's capacity to synergize with normal brain tissue, are currently under investigation. The compound Si306, a pyrazolo[3,4-d] pyrimidine derivative, selected for its favorable activity against SRC, was tested in vitro and in vivo on glioblastoma cell lines. In vivo, combination treatment with Si306 and radiotherapy was strongly active in reducing U-87 xenograft growth with respect to control and single treatments. The histology revealed a significant difference in the stromal compartment of tumoral tissue derived from control or radiotherapy-treated samples with respect to Si306-treated samples, showing in the latter a reduced presence of collagen and alpha-SMA-positive cells. This effect was paralleled in vitro by the capacity of Si306 to interfere with myofibroblastic differentiation of normal fibroblasts induced by U-87 cells. In the presence of Si306, TGF-beta released by U-87 cells, mainly in hypoxia, was ineffective in upregulating alpha-SMA and beta-PDGFR in fibroblasts. Si306 efficiently reached the brain and significantly prolonged the survival of mice orthotopically injected with U-87 cells. Drugs that target SRC could represent an effective therapeutic strategy in glioblastoma, able to block positive paracrine loop with stromal cells based on the beta-PDGFR axis and the formation of a tumor-promoting micro-environment. This approach could be important in combination with conventional treatments in the effort to reduce tumor resistance to therapy. (C) 2016 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据