4.7 Article

Thermal behaviors of a novel N-oxide amphoteric energetic compound 4,6-diamino-3-hydroxy-2-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1,3,5-triazine-1-oxide

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-023-12601-7

关键词

4,6-diamino-3-hydroxy-2-carbonyl-2,3-dihydro-1,3,5-triazine-1-oxide; Thermal decomposition; Gaseous products; Amphoteric energetic compound

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The thermal behavior of DAOTO was systematically studied using techniques such as differential scanning calorimeter, thermogravimetric analyzer, and thermogravimetric-mass-infrared spectrometry. It was found that DAOTO has good thermal stability and its thermal decomposition process was analyzed. This study provides theoretical support for the application of DAOTO.
To evaluate thermal properties and promote the application of novel N-oxide amphoteric energetic compound 4,6-diamino-3-hydroxy-2-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1,3,5-triazine-1-oxide (DAOTO), thermal behaviors of DAOTO were studied systematically by differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), thermogravimetric analyzer (TG/DTG) and thermogravimetric-mass-infrared spectrometry (TG-MS-FTIR) techniques. Results showed that DAOTO has only an obvious exothermic decomposition process during the range of 250 similar to 350 degrees C with an extrapolated starting point temperature (T-e) of 291.6 degrees C, a peak temperature (T-p) of 320.6 degrees C, a heat release of 1317 J g(-1) and a corresponding mass loss of similar to 17%, at a heating rate of 10 degrees C min(-1), and the kinetic equation of thermal decomposition process was obtained. The main thermal decomposition gas products of DAOTO are H2O, NH3 and CO, and the possible thermal decomposition process was analyzed. Besides, the specific heat capacity of DAOTO at 298.15 K was determined as 1.14 J g(-1) K-1, and adiabatic time-to-explosion was calculated to be a certain value between 100 and 105 s. This work proved DAOTO having a good thermal stability and provided theoretical support for the application of DAOTO.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据