4.4 Article

Enhanced precision of circadian rhythm by output system

期刊

JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY
卷 574, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2023.111621

关键词

Circadian rhythms; Fluctuations; Output system; Phase model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the fluctuations in the oscillation period of the circadian clock and its output system. The results showed that the output system has smaller fluctuations compared to the circadian clock, suggesting that it can improve the accuracy of the circadian rhythm.
Circadian rhythms are biological rhythms with a period of approximately 24 h that persist even under constant conditions without daily environmental cues. The molecular circadian clock machinery generates physiological rhythms, which can be transmitted into the downstream output system. Owing to the stochastic nature of the biochemical reactions and the extracellular environment, the oscillation period of circadian rhythms exhibited by individual organisms or cells is not constant on a daily basis with variations as high as 10%, as reflected by the coefficient of variation. Although the fluctuations in the circadian rhythm are measured through a reporter system such as bioluminescence or fluorescence, which is an example of output systems, experimentally confirming whether the fluctuations found in the reporter system are the same as those in the circadian clock is challenging. This study investigated a coupled system of a circadian clock and its output system numerically and analytically, and then compared the fluctuations in the oscillation period of the two systems. We found that the amount of fluctuations in the output system is smaller than that in the circadian clock, assuming the degradation rate of the molecules responsible for the output system is a typical value for protein degradation. The results indicate that the output system can improve the accuracy of the circadian rhythm without the need for any denoising processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据