4.4 Article

Cusp bifurcation in a metastatic regulatory network

期刊

JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY
卷 575, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2023.111630

关键词

Cusp; Two-parameter bifurcation theory; Metastasis; Regulatory network; Bistable

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers propose a mathematical concept for modeling metastatic breast cancer systems and investigate the state transitions of the system using bifurcation theory. The study reveals that two-parameter bifurcations can separate different cell state transition modalities, providing a new perspective for defining such transitions based on mathematical theory.
Understanding the potential for cancers to metastasize is still relatively unknown. While many predictive methods may use deep learning or stochastic processes, we highlight a long standing mathematical concept that may be useful for modeling metastatic breast cancer systems. Ordinary differential equations (ODEs) can model cell state transitions by considering the pertinent environmental variables as well as the paths systems take over time. Bifurcation theory is a branch of dynamical systems which studies changes in the behavior of an ODE system while one or more parameters are varied. Many studies have applied concepts in one-parameter bifurcation theory to model biological network dynamics, and cell division. However, studies of two-parameter bifurcations are much more rare. Two-parameter bifurcations have not been studied in metastatic systems. Here we show how a specific two-parameter bifurcation phenomenon called a cusp bifurcation separates two qualitatively different metastatic cell state transitions modalities and propose a new perspective on defining such transitions based on mathematical theory. We hope the observations and verification methods detailed here may help in the understanding of metastatic potential from a basic biological perspective and in clinical settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据