3.8 Article

Biological products in allergy practice: the beginning of a new era

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
卷 66, 期 9, 页码 518-521

出版社

KOREAN MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.5124/jkma.2023.66.9.518

关键词

Biological products; Hypersensitivity; Drug therapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of biological products (BPs) or molecularly targeted drugs has significantly improved the treatment of allergic diseases, providing effective and low-risk options for severe cases. BPs have also advanced our understanding of disease mechanisms and the prediction of therapeutic responses. However, their high cost and long-term administration limit their widespread use.
Background: Recently, the treatment of allergic diseases has significantly progressed with the development and increased use of biological products (BPs) or molecularly targeted drugs. Based on cases with asthma, using BPs in allergic diseases has expanded to include chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, atopic dermatitis, and chronic spontaneous urticaria. Current Concepts: BPs are effective in treating severe allergic diseases, which often have limitations with current treatments and limited therapeutic options available. The added efficacy of BPs includes reduced risk of side effects from using systemic corticosteroids. Additional to transforming clinical care, BPs have provided insights into disease mechanisms and identified biomarkers to predict therapeutic responses. This has opened a new era towards personalized and precise treatment. Discussion and Conclusion: BPs for patients with severe asthma reduce symptoms and risks of exacerbations. Because of these observations, whether the remission of allergic diseases can be achieved by BPs has been pondered. Another agonizing problem is that BPs are expensive and many patients require prolonged administration for disease control. As more BPs become available, costs will likely decrease, leading to their more widespread use. Indeed, a new era in the treatment of allergic diseases has begun.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据