4.7 Article

Public Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Residential Neighborhoods

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 31, 期 18, 页码 1777-1788

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.08.036

关键词

automated external defibrillators; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; first responders; out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; sudden cardiac death; volunteer responders

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed interventions before ambulance arrival and survival for public out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients in residential neighborhoods. The results showed that there were fewer resuscitative efforts before ambulance arrival and lower survival rates for OHCA patients in residential neighborhoods compared to nonresidential areas. Therefore, targeted efforts to improve early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and defibrillation for public OHCA patients in residential neighborhoods are needed.
BACKGROUND Although one-half of all public out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) occur outside private homes in residential neighborhoods, their characteristics and outcomes remain unexplored.OBJECTIVES The authors assessed interventions before ambulance arrival and survival for public OHCA patients in residential neighborhoods.METHODS Public OHCAs from Vienna (2018-2021) and Copenhagen (2016-2020) were designated residential neigh-borhoods or nonresidential areas. Interventions (cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR], automated external defibrillator [AED] attached, and defibrillation) and 30-day survival were compared using a generalized estimation equation model adjusted for age and time of day and presented as ORs.RESULTS We included 1,052 and 654 public OHCAs from Vienna and Copenhagen, respectively, and 68% and 55% occurred in residential neighborhoods, respectively. The likelihood of CPR, defibrillation, and survival in residential neighborhoods vs nonresidential areas (reference) were as follows: CPR Vienna, 73% vs 78%, OR: 0.78 (95% CI: 0.57-1.06), CPR Copenhagen, 83% vs 90%, OR: 0.54 (95% CI: 0.34-0.88), and CPR combined, 76% vs 84%, OR: 0.70 (95% CI: 0.53-0.90); AED attached Vienna, 36% vs 44%, OR: 0.69 (95% CI: 0.53-0.90), AED attached Copenhagen, 21% vs 43%, OR: 0.33 (95% CI: 0.24-0.48), and AED attached combined, 31% vs 44%, OR: 0.53 (95% CI: 0.42-0.65); defi-brillation Vienna, 14% vs 20%, OR: 0.61 (95% CI: 0.43-0.87), defibrillation Copenhagen, 16% vs 36%, OR: 0.35 (95% CI: 0.24-0.51), and defibrillation combined, 15% vs 27%, OR: 0.46 (95% CI: 0.36-0.61); and 30-day survival rate Vienna, 21% vs 26%, OR: 0.84 (95% CI: 0.58-1.20), 30-day survival rate Copenhagen, 33% vs 44%, OR: 0.65 (95% CI: 0.47-0.90), and 30-day survival rate combined, 25% vs 36%, OR: 0.73 (95% CI: 0.58-0.93).CONCLUSIONS Two-thirds of public OHCAs occurred in residential neighborhoods with fewer resuscitative efforts before ambulance arrival and lower survival than in nonresidential areas. Targeted efforts to improve early CPR and defibrillation for public OHCA patients in residential neighborhoods are needed. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2023;82:1777-1788)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据