4.6 Article

Single nucleotide polymorphism tightly linked to a major QTL on chromosome 7A for both kernel length and kernel weight in wheat

期刊

MOLECULAR BREEDING
卷 36, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11032-016-0436-4

关键词

Triticum aestivum; 92K SNP array; TaTKW-7AL; KASPar markers; Pleiotropic effect on yield traits

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31401381]
  2. National Research Initiative Competitive Grants CAP Project from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, USA [2011-68002-30029]
  3. ARS [ARS-0424855, 813469] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thousand-kernel weight (TKW) is one of the major components of grain yield in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Identifying major quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for TKW and developing effective markers are prerequisite for success in marker-assisted selection (MAS) to improve wheat yield through breeding. This study mapped a major QTL, designated as TaTKW-7AL, for increasing TKW on the long arm of chromosome 7A of 'Clark' to a 1.3-cM interval between single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers IWB13913 and IWA5913. This QTL explained 19.7 % of the phenotypic variation for TKW. A QTL for increasing kernel length (KL), one of the major components of TKW, was mapped in the same interval as TaTKW-7AL, suggesting that increased TKW by the QTL in 'Clark' is most likely due to the increased KL. Association analysis on a diversity panel of 200 US winter wheat accessions also identified a haplotype of three SNP markers (IWB13913, IWB6693 and IWA5913) that were tightly associated with the both KL and TKW. The analysis of allele frequencies of the haplotype in the diversity panel suggested that the favorable allele of TaTKW-7AL has not been strongly selected for in practice and has potential to be used to improve grain yield in US hard winter wheat breeding. Two user-friendly flanking KASParmarkers, IWB13913 and IWA5913, were developed for MAS of TaTKW-7AL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据