4.8 Article

Twist Angle-Dependent Intervalley Charge Carrier Transfer and Recombination in Bilayer WS2

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 145, 期 41, 页码 22826-22835

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.3c09170

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Twisting angle affects electronic structure, interlayer coupling, and carrier dynamics in bilayer WS2, enhancing hole transfer but slowing down intervalley recombination. Breathing, in-plane and out-of-plane modes play vital roles in carrier transfer and recombination in twisted junctions.
A twist angle at a van der Waals junction provides a handle to tune its optoelectronic properties for a variety of applications, and a comprehensive understanding of how the twist modulates electronic structure, interlayer coupling, and carrier dynamics is needed. We employ time-dependent density functional theory and nonadiabatic molecular dynamics to elucidate angle-dependent intervalley carrier transfer and recombination in bilayer WS2. Repulsion between S atoms in twisted configurations weakens interlayer coupling, increases the interlayer distance, and softens layer breathing modes. Twisting has a minor influence on K valleys while it lowers Gamma valleys and raises Q valleys because their wave functions are delocalized between layers. Consequently, the reduced energy gaps between the K and Gamma valleys accelerate the hole transfer in the twisted structures. Intervalley electron transfer proceeds nearly an order of magnitude faster than hole transfer. The more localized wave functions at K than Q values and larger bandgaps result in smaller nonadiabatic couplings for intervalley recombination, making it 3-4 times slower in twisted than high-symmetry structures. B-2g breathing, E-2g in-plane, and A(1g) out-of-plane modes are most active during intervalley carrier transfer and recombination. The faster intervalley transfer and extended carrier lifetimes in twisted junctions are favorable for optoelectronic device performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据