4.8 Article

Arene Insertion with Pincer-Supported Molybdenum-Hydrides: Determination of Site Selectivity, Relative Rates, and Arene Complex Formation

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 145, 期 38, 页码 21027-21039

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.3c06961

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study describes the synthesis of phosphino(oxazoline)pyridine-supported molybdenum(0) cycloocta-1,5-diene complexes and their reactions with dihydrogen and arenes. The study found that the site selectivity of arene insertion reactions depended on the size of the substituent, and electron-rich arenes had faster insertion rates. Additionally, through mechanistic studies, the synthesis of enantioenriched cyclohexa-1,3-diene was achieved.
The synthesis of phosphino(oxazoline)pyridine-supported molybdenum(0) cycloocta-1,5-diene complexes is described. Exposure of these complexes to dihydrogen in the presence of an arene resulted in insertion of the substrate into the molybdenum hydride bond and afforded the corresponding molybdenum cyclohexadienyl hydrides. For mono- and disubstituted arenes, the site selectivity for insertion of the most substituted bond increases with increasing size of the substituent from methyl to ethyl, iso-propyl, and tert-butyl. In contrast, 1,3,5-trisubstituted arenes underwent insertion with exclusive site selectivity. Relative rates of insertion were determined by competition experiments and established faster insertions for electron-rich arenes. Introduction of electron-withdrawing trifluoromethyl groups on the arene resulted in decreased relative rates of insertion and an increased rate for H(2 )reductive elimination, favoring formation of the corresponding molybdenum ?(6)-arene complex. Studies on the reductive elimination of the cyclohexadienyl ligand with the hydride enabled the synthesis of an enantioenriched cyclohexa-1,3-diene. This study provides new insights into the ligand requirements for catalytic arene hydrogenation and a new strategy for selective arene reduction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据