4.5 Article

Cu0-decorated, carbon-doped rutile TiO2 nanofibers via one step electrospinning: Effective photocatalyst for azo dyes degradation under solar light

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2015.06.015

关键词

Copper nanoparticles; Titania carbon nanofibers; Electrospinning; Azo dyes

资金

  1. MKE/KEIT [10041957, 10041947]
  2. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University [021]
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10041947] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, zero valent copper nanoparticles (Cuo NPs)-decorated, carbon-doped titania nanofibers were successfully prepared by electrospinning of a solution composed of titanium isopropoxide (TIP), polyvinylpyrroliodine (PVP), and copper(H) acetate tetrahydrate. The calcination of the formed nanofiber mats in Ar atmosphere at 850 degrees C led to produce good morphology nanofibers. The produced powder was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM), and field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM). Characterization techniques indicated that the obtained material is Cuo NPs-decorated, carbon-doped TiO2 nanofibers. The synthesized nanofibers were used as photocatalyst for the effective degradation of reactive black 5 (RB5) and methyl red (MR) azo dyes in aqueous solution. The introduced nanofibers showed good photodegradation activity under sunlight. Overall, introduced nanofibers revealed a better photocatalytic activity when compared to pristine TiO2 nanofibers. The better performance was due to the removal of RB5 and MR at 83% and 65%, respectively. This study opens a new avenue to produce transition metal-decorated, carbon-doped titania nanofibers in a single production step for the use in different catalytic reactions. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据