4.5 Article

Preliminary examination of sounds produced by Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) during their fall spawning migrationa)

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
卷 154, 期 4, 页码 2665-2675

出版社

ACOUSTICAL SOC AMER AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1121/10.0021970

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A preliminary study was conducted to describe the sounds produced by three species of Pacific salmon, revealing distinct differences in sound characteristics, especially in the area of air movement sounds where pink salmon stood out. This represents the first detailed description of the types and characteristics of sounds produced by wild Pacific salmon.
A preliminary description of sounds produced by three species of Pacific salmon was conducted to address the lack of quantified call characteristics in previous studies. Wild Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), pink salmon (O. gorbuscha), and coho salmon (O. kisutch) were diverted from a natural spawning migration in the Big Qualicum River located on Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada and held in the adjacent hatchery during the 2017 fall migration. Underwater sounds were opportunistically recorded continuously over four week in holding raceways containing Chinook only, coho only, or mixed pink and Chinook salmon, and examined for sounds. All groups produced sounds in three categories based on mechanism: hydrodynamic (surface splash), air movement (miscellaneous and 7 named types), and unknown mechanism (pulse). Pulse, gill-bubble fast repetitive tick air movement sounds, and miscellaneous air movement sounds occurred in all groups and differences in some characteristics of sounds were found between the species groups. Additionally, even though pink salmon were not recorded separately, data suggest they produce a very fast repetitive tick air movement sound more often compared to Chinook salmon. Our results represent the first detailed description of the types and characteristics of sounds produced by wild Pacific salmon.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据