4.5 Article

Active control of sound transmission through a floor-level slit

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
卷 154, 期 5, 页码 2746-2756

出版社

ACOUSTICAL SOC AMER AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1121/10.0022050

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An active noise control system is proposed in this paper to reduce sound transmission through a floor-level slit using evenly distributed secondary sources on its top boundary. The system's performance is investigated through analytical and numerical models, and simulation results show a decrease in performance with increasing frequency. The upper limit frequency for effective control increases with more secondary sources and is approximately the interval between the sources when a plane wave is incident normally.
The floor-level slit between the door and the floor is one weak point in building noise insulation. In this paper, an active noise control system is proposed to reduce the sound transmission through a floor-level slit with evenly distributed secondary sources on its top boundary. The system performance is first investigated based on the analytical and numerical models, and simulation results indicate a decrease in active control performance with increasing frequency. The upper limit frequency of 10 dB effective control increases with a higher number of secondary sources, and the corresponding wavelength of the upper limit frequency is approximately the interval between the secondary sources when a plane wave is incident normally. Although the upper limit frequency decreases with the slit height, it approaches a constant when the slit height becomes significantly smaller than the wavelength in the incident sound. The experimental results based on a typical floor-level door slit support the findings in the numerical simulations. For a slit with a width of 0.9 m and a height of 0.005 m, the upper limit frequency of 10 dB noise reduction can reach up to 2830 Hz when ten secondary sources are employed in the experiments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据