4.4 Article

An Overview on the Dispersion of Steel Fiber in Ultra-High- Performance Concrete

期刊

JOURNAL OF TESTING AND EVALUATION
卷 52, 期 1, 页码 707-730

出版社

AMER SOC TESTING MATERIALS
DOI: 10.1520/JTE20230091

关键词

ultra-high-performance concrete; steel fiber; distribution; orientation; influence factor; modeling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper summarizes the influencing factors, evaluation methods, and theoretical models of steel fiber dispersion in ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC). It indicates that a scientifically designed mixture and adjustment of matrix rheological properties can improve fiber dispersion. In addition, flow induction and the wall effect can enhance the orientation of fibers and improve the performance of UHPC matrix.
Ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) is widely recognized for its high toughness, which is directly affected by the dispersion of steel fiber and its loading mode. To investigate the reinforcement effect of steel fiber, this paper summarizes the influencing factors, evaluation methods, and theoretical models of steel fiber dispersion in UHPC. First, the results reveal that a scientifically designed mixture can reduce the cost of steel fiber dosage in UHPC and improve fiber dispersion by adjusting matrix rheological properties. The optimum plastic viscosity of the slurry should range from 30 to 80 Pa center dot s for achieving the best fiber dispersion effect. Second, during slurry placement, the orientation of fibers in UHPC can be improved by up to 80 % through flow induction and the wall effect, which increases the bending strength, tensile strength, and toughness of UHPC matrix by 5-67 %, 30-90 %, and 13-200 %, respectively. Moreover, although the dispersion of fiber in two-dimensional space has been extensively studied, further characterization in three-dimensional space is required. Lastly, some theoretical simulation results have been achieved on fiber orientation, but factors such as aggregate or reinforcement must be considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据